125 lines
4.5 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

[Kernel] FP8 support for MoE kernel / Mixtral (#4244) This PR is the first step towards fixing https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/3208 It implements dynamic per-tensor scaling (see https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/4118), so users do not need to compute activation scales on a calibration dataset and they also don't need to convert their model checkpoints. It is enough to specify the `quantization="fp8"` argument. You can try out the PR like this: ```python from vllm import LLM, SamplingParams prompts = [ "Hello, my name is", "The president of the United States is", "The capital of France is", "The future of AI is", ] sampling_params = SamplingParams(temperature=0.8, top_p=0.95) llm = LLM(model="mistralai/Mixtral-8x7B-Instruct-v0.1", tensor_parallel_size=2, quantization="fp8") outputs = llm.generate(prompts, sampling_params) # Print the outputs. for output in outputs: prompt = output.prompt generated_text = output.outputs[0].text print(f"Prompt: {prompt!r}, Generated text: {generated_text!r}") ``` **Performance**: For this PR, the focus is on making the code clean (while still trying to get reasonable performance), there is a bunch of optimizations that we will submit as a follow up PR that significantly improve the performance (similar to the numbers in https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/3954). With this PR, the results are as follows: <img width="725" alt="Screenshot 2024-04-21 at 1 31 50 PM" src="https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/assets/113316/d8fe1118-07a0-4d4e-8530-37a77d465a03"> **Accuracy**: The accuracy with this PR on MMLU on `mistralai/Mixtral-8x7B-v0.1` is as follows: ``` | Groups |Version|Filter|n-shot|Metric|Value | |Stderr| |------------------|-------|------|-----:|------|-----:|---|-----:| |mmlu |N/A |none | 0|acc |0.7018|± |0.0036| | - humanities |N/A |none | 5|acc |0.6472|± |0.0065| | - other |N/A |none | 5|acc |0.7673|± |0.0072| | - social_sciences|N/A |none | 5|acc |0.8099|± |0.0070| | - stem |N/A |none | 5|acc |0.6131|± |0.0083| ``` this compares favorably with the fp16 results which are ``` | Groups |Version|Filter|n-shot|Metric|Value | |Stderr| |------------------|-------|------|-----:|------|-----:|---|-----:| |mmlu |N/A |none | 0|acc |0.7020|± |0.1313| | - humanities |N/A |none | 5|acc |0.6425|± |0.1349| | - other |N/A |none | 5|acc |0.7744|± |0.1038| | - social_sciences|N/A |none | 5|acc |0.8131|± |0.0695| | - stem |N/A |none | 5|acc |0.6108|± |0.1383| ``` Happy hacking!
2024-04-23 18:18:23 -07:00
#include <ATen/cuda/CUDAContext.h>
#include <torch/extension.h>
#include <c10/cuda/CUDAGuard.h>
#include <cmath>
#include "cuda_compat.h"
#include "dispatch_utils.h"
namespace vllm {
__device__ __forceinline__ float atomicMaxFloat(float* addr, float value) {
float old;
old = (value >= 0)
? __int_as_float(atomicMax((int*)addr, __float_as_int(value)))
: __uint_as_float(
atomicMin((unsigned int*)addr, __float_as_uint(value)));
[Kernel] FP8 support for MoE kernel / Mixtral (#4244) This PR is the first step towards fixing https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/3208 It implements dynamic per-tensor scaling (see https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/4118), so users do not need to compute activation scales on a calibration dataset and they also don't need to convert their model checkpoints. It is enough to specify the `quantization="fp8"` argument. You can try out the PR like this: ```python from vllm import LLM, SamplingParams prompts = [ "Hello, my name is", "The president of the United States is", "The capital of France is", "The future of AI is", ] sampling_params = SamplingParams(temperature=0.8, top_p=0.95) llm = LLM(model="mistralai/Mixtral-8x7B-Instruct-v0.1", tensor_parallel_size=2, quantization="fp8") outputs = llm.generate(prompts, sampling_params) # Print the outputs. for output in outputs: prompt = output.prompt generated_text = output.outputs[0].text print(f"Prompt: {prompt!r}, Generated text: {generated_text!r}") ``` **Performance**: For this PR, the focus is on making the code clean (while still trying to get reasonable performance), there is a bunch of optimizations that we will submit as a follow up PR that significantly improve the performance (similar to the numbers in https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/3954). With this PR, the results are as follows: <img width="725" alt="Screenshot 2024-04-21 at 1 31 50 PM" src="https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/assets/113316/d8fe1118-07a0-4d4e-8530-37a77d465a03"> **Accuracy**: The accuracy with this PR on MMLU on `mistralai/Mixtral-8x7B-v0.1` is as follows: ``` | Groups |Version|Filter|n-shot|Metric|Value | |Stderr| |------------------|-------|------|-----:|------|-----:|---|-----:| |mmlu |N/A |none | 0|acc |0.7018|± |0.0036| | - humanities |N/A |none | 5|acc |0.6472|± |0.0065| | - other |N/A |none | 5|acc |0.7673|± |0.0072| | - social_sciences|N/A |none | 5|acc |0.8099|± |0.0070| | - stem |N/A |none | 5|acc |0.6131|± |0.0083| ``` this compares favorably with the fp16 results which are ``` | Groups |Version|Filter|n-shot|Metric|Value | |Stderr| |------------------|-------|------|-----:|------|-----:|---|-----:| |mmlu |N/A |none | 0|acc |0.7020|± |0.1313| | - humanities |N/A |none | 5|acc |0.6425|± |0.1349| | - other |N/A |none | 5|acc |0.7744|± |0.1038| | - social_sciences|N/A |none | 5|acc |0.8131|± |0.0695| | - stem |N/A |none | 5|acc |0.6108|± |0.1383| ``` Happy hacking!
2024-04-23 18:18:23 -07:00
return old;
[Kernel] FP8 support for MoE kernel / Mixtral (#4244) This PR is the first step towards fixing https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/3208 It implements dynamic per-tensor scaling (see https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/4118), so users do not need to compute activation scales on a calibration dataset and they also don't need to convert their model checkpoints. It is enough to specify the `quantization="fp8"` argument. You can try out the PR like this: ```python from vllm import LLM, SamplingParams prompts = [ "Hello, my name is", "The president of the United States is", "The capital of France is", "The future of AI is", ] sampling_params = SamplingParams(temperature=0.8, top_p=0.95) llm = LLM(model="mistralai/Mixtral-8x7B-Instruct-v0.1", tensor_parallel_size=2, quantization="fp8") outputs = llm.generate(prompts, sampling_params) # Print the outputs. for output in outputs: prompt = output.prompt generated_text = output.outputs[0].text print(f"Prompt: {prompt!r}, Generated text: {generated_text!r}") ``` **Performance**: For this PR, the focus is on making the code clean (while still trying to get reasonable performance), there is a bunch of optimizations that we will submit as a follow up PR that significantly improve the performance (similar to the numbers in https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/3954). With this PR, the results are as follows: <img width="725" alt="Screenshot 2024-04-21 at 1 31 50 PM" src="https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/assets/113316/d8fe1118-07a0-4d4e-8530-37a77d465a03"> **Accuracy**: The accuracy with this PR on MMLU on `mistralai/Mixtral-8x7B-v0.1` is as follows: ``` | Groups |Version|Filter|n-shot|Metric|Value | |Stderr| |------------------|-------|------|-----:|------|-----:|---|-----:| |mmlu |N/A |none | 0|acc |0.7018|± |0.0036| | - humanities |N/A |none | 5|acc |0.6472|± |0.0065| | - other |N/A |none | 5|acc |0.7673|± |0.0072| | - social_sciences|N/A |none | 5|acc |0.8099|± |0.0070| | - stem |N/A |none | 5|acc |0.6131|± |0.0083| ``` this compares favorably with the fp16 results which are ``` | Groups |Version|Filter|n-shot|Metric|Value | |Stderr| |------------------|-------|------|-----:|------|-----:|---|-----:| |mmlu |N/A |none | 0|acc |0.7020|± |0.1313| | - humanities |N/A |none | 5|acc |0.6425|± |0.1349| | - other |N/A |none | 5|acc |0.7744|± |0.1038| | - social_sciences|N/A |none | 5|acc |0.8131|± |0.0695| | - stem |N/A |none | 5|acc |0.6108|± |0.1383| ``` Happy hacking!
2024-04-23 18:18:23 -07:00
}
[Kernel] Make static FP8 scaling more robust (#4570) Previously FP8 static scaling works if the scales are overestimating the maxima of all activation tensors during computation. However this will not always be the case even if the scales were calibrated very carefully. For example, with the activations in my checkpoint https://huggingface.co/pcmoritz/Mixtral-8x7B-v0.1-fp8-act-scale (which was calibrated on https://huggingface.co/datasets/HuggingFaceH4/ultrachat_200k), I'm getting the following mostly random performance on MMLU: | Groups |Version|Filter|n-shot|Metric|Value | |Stderr| |------------------|-------|------|-----:|------|-----:|---|-----:| |mmlu |N/A |none | 0|acc |0.2295|± |0.0035| | - humanities |N/A |none | 5|acc |0.2421|± |0.0062| | - other |N/A |none | 5|acc |0.2398|± |0.0076| | - social_sciences|N/A |none | 5|acc |0.2171|± |0.0074| | - stem |N/A |none | 5|acc |0.2125|± |0.0073| With the fix in this PR where the scaled activations are clamped between [-std::numeric_limits<c10::Float8_e4m3fn>::max(), std::numeric_limits<c10::Float8_e4m3fn>::max()] to make sure there are no NaNs, the performance is | Groups |Version|Filter|n-shot|Metric|Value | |Stderr| |------------------|-------|------|-----:|------|-----:|---|-----:| |mmlu |N/A |none | 0|acc |0.7008|± |0.0036| | - humanities |N/A |none | 5|acc |0.6453|± |0.0065| | - other |N/A |none | 5|acc |0.7692|± |0.0072| | - social_sciences|N/A |none | 5|acc |0.8083|± |0.0070| | - stem |N/A |none | 5|acc |0.6115|± |0.0083| This is not perfect yet but is getting very close to the FP16 / dynamic activation scale performance.
2024-05-06 17:39:28 -07:00
#define FP8_E4M3_MAX std::numeric_limits<c10::Float8_e4m3fn>::max()
template <typename scalar_t>
__device__ __forceinline__ c10::Float8_e4m3fn scaled_fp8_conversion(
const scalar_t val, const float scale) {
[Kernel] Make static FP8 scaling more robust (#4570) Previously FP8 static scaling works if the scales are overestimating the maxima of all activation tensors during computation. However this will not always be the case even if the scales were calibrated very carefully. For example, with the activations in my checkpoint https://huggingface.co/pcmoritz/Mixtral-8x7B-v0.1-fp8-act-scale (which was calibrated on https://huggingface.co/datasets/HuggingFaceH4/ultrachat_200k), I'm getting the following mostly random performance on MMLU: | Groups |Version|Filter|n-shot|Metric|Value | |Stderr| |------------------|-------|------|-----:|------|-----:|---|-----:| |mmlu |N/A |none | 0|acc |0.2295|± |0.0035| | - humanities |N/A |none | 5|acc |0.2421|± |0.0062| | - other |N/A |none | 5|acc |0.2398|± |0.0076| | - social_sciences|N/A |none | 5|acc |0.2171|± |0.0074| | - stem |N/A |none | 5|acc |0.2125|± |0.0073| With the fix in this PR where the scaled activations are clamped between [-std::numeric_limits<c10::Float8_e4m3fn>::max(), std::numeric_limits<c10::Float8_e4m3fn>::max()] to make sure there are no NaNs, the performance is | Groups |Version|Filter|n-shot|Metric|Value | |Stderr| |------------------|-------|------|-----:|------|-----:|---|-----:| |mmlu |N/A |none | 0|acc |0.7008|± |0.0036| | - humanities |N/A |none | 5|acc |0.6453|± |0.0065| | - other |N/A |none | 5|acc |0.7692|± |0.0072| | - social_sciences|N/A |none | 5|acc |0.8083|± |0.0070| | - stem |N/A |none | 5|acc |0.6115|± |0.0083| This is not perfect yet but is getting very close to the FP16 / dynamic activation scale performance.
2024-05-06 17:39:28 -07:00
float x = static_cast<float>(val) / scale;
float r = fmax(-FP8_E4M3_MAX, fmin(x, FP8_E4M3_MAX));
return static_cast<c10::Float8_e4m3fn>(r);
}
[Kernel] FP8 support for MoE kernel / Mixtral (#4244) This PR is the first step towards fixing https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/3208 It implements dynamic per-tensor scaling (see https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/4118), so users do not need to compute activation scales on a calibration dataset and they also don't need to convert their model checkpoints. It is enough to specify the `quantization="fp8"` argument. You can try out the PR like this: ```python from vllm import LLM, SamplingParams prompts = [ "Hello, my name is", "The president of the United States is", "The capital of France is", "The future of AI is", ] sampling_params = SamplingParams(temperature=0.8, top_p=0.95) llm = LLM(model="mistralai/Mixtral-8x7B-Instruct-v0.1", tensor_parallel_size=2, quantization="fp8") outputs = llm.generate(prompts, sampling_params) # Print the outputs. for output in outputs: prompt = output.prompt generated_text = output.outputs[0].text print(f"Prompt: {prompt!r}, Generated text: {generated_text!r}") ``` **Performance**: For this PR, the focus is on making the code clean (while still trying to get reasonable performance), there is a bunch of optimizations that we will submit as a follow up PR that significantly improve the performance (similar to the numbers in https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/3954). With this PR, the results are as follows: <img width="725" alt="Screenshot 2024-04-21 at 1 31 50 PM" src="https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/assets/113316/d8fe1118-07a0-4d4e-8530-37a77d465a03"> **Accuracy**: The accuracy with this PR on MMLU on `mistralai/Mixtral-8x7B-v0.1` is as follows: ``` | Groups |Version|Filter|n-shot|Metric|Value | |Stderr| |------------------|-------|------|-----:|------|-----:|---|-----:| |mmlu |N/A |none | 0|acc |0.7018|± |0.0036| | - humanities |N/A |none | 5|acc |0.6472|± |0.0065| | - other |N/A |none | 5|acc |0.7673|± |0.0072| | - social_sciences|N/A |none | 5|acc |0.8099|± |0.0070| | - stem |N/A |none | 5|acc |0.6131|± |0.0083| ``` this compares favorably with the fp16 results which are ``` | Groups |Version|Filter|n-shot|Metric|Value | |Stderr| |------------------|-------|------|-----:|------|-----:|---|-----:| |mmlu |N/A |none | 0|acc |0.7020|± |0.1313| | - humanities |N/A |none | 5|acc |0.6425|± |0.1349| | - other |N/A |none | 5|acc |0.7744|± |0.1038| | - social_sciences|N/A |none | 5|acc |0.8131|± |0.0695| | - stem |N/A |none | 5|acc |0.6108|± |0.1383| ``` Happy hacking!
2024-04-23 18:18:23 -07:00
// Compute the absolute maximum m of the input tensor and store
// m / float8_e4m3::max() in *scale. Each thread block performs a
// reduction tree and the memory in scale is atomically updated.
// So to get the right answer, *scale needs to be initialized to
// a value <= 0.0 and we need to wait for all thread blocks to
// finish before consuming *scale.
template <typename scalar_t>
__global__ void segmented_max_reduction(float* __restrict__ scale,
const scalar_t* __restrict__ input,
int64_t num_elems) {
[Kernel] FP8 support for MoE kernel / Mixtral (#4244) This PR is the first step towards fixing https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/3208 It implements dynamic per-tensor scaling (see https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/4118), so users do not need to compute activation scales on a calibration dataset and they also don't need to convert their model checkpoints. It is enough to specify the `quantization="fp8"` argument. You can try out the PR like this: ```python from vllm import LLM, SamplingParams prompts = [ "Hello, my name is", "The president of the United States is", "The capital of France is", "The future of AI is", ] sampling_params = SamplingParams(temperature=0.8, top_p=0.95) llm = LLM(model="mistralai/Mixtral-8x7B-Instruct-v0.1", tensor_parallel_size=2, quantization="fp8") outputs = llm.generate(prompts, sampling_params) # Print the outputs. for output in outputs: prompt = output.prompt generated_text = output.outputs[0].text print(f"Prompt: {prompt!r}, Generated text: {generated_text!r}") ``` **Performance**: For this PR, the focus is on making the code clean (while still trying to get reasonable performance), there is a bunch of optimizations that we will submit as a follow up PR that significantly improve the performance (similar to the numbers in https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/3954). With this PR, the results are as follows: <img width="725" alt="Screenshot 2024-04-21 at 1 31 50 PM" src="https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/assets/113316/d8fe1118-07a0-4d4e-8530-37a77d465a03"> **Accuracy**: The accuracy with this PR on MMLU on `mistralai/Mixtral-8x7B-v0.1` is as follows: ``` | Groups |Version|Filter|n-shot|Metric|Value | |Stderr| |------------------|-------|------|-----:|------|-----:|---|-----:| |mmlu |N/A |none | 0|acc |0.7018|± |0.0036| | - humanities |N/A |none | 5|acc |0.6472|± |0.0065| | - other |N/A |none | 5|acc |0.7673|± |0.0072| | - social_sciences|N/A |none | 5|acc |0.8099|± |0.0070| | - stem |N/A |none | 5|acc |0.6131|± |0.0083| ``` this compares favorably with the fp16 results which are ``` | Groups |Version|Filter|n-shot|Metric|Value | |Stderr| |------------------|-------|------|-----:|------|-----:|---|-----:| |mmlu |N/A |none | 0|acc |0.7020|± |0.1313| | - humanities |N/A |none | 5|acc |0.6425|± |0.1349| | - other |N/A |none | 5|acc |0.7744|± |0.1038| | - social_sciences|N/A |none | 5|acc |0.8131|± |0.0695| | - stem |N/A |none | 5|acc |0.6108|± |0.1383| ``` Happy hacking!
2024-04-23 18:18:23 -07:00
__shared__ float cache[1024];
int i = blockDim.x * blockIdx.x + threadIdx.x;
// First store maximum for all values processes by
// the current thread in cache[threadIdx.x]
scalar_t tmp = 0.0;
while (i < num_elems) {
float x = static_cast<float>(input[i]);
tmp = max(tmp, fabs(x));
i += blockDim.x * gridDim.x;
}
cache[threadIdx.x] = tmp;
__syncthreads();
// Now perform parallel reduction within the thread block
int ib = blockDim.x / 2;
while (ib != 0) {
if (threadIdx.x < ib && cache[threadIdx.x + ib] > cache[threadIdx.x]) {
cache[threadIdx.x] = cache[threadIdx.x + ib];
[Kernel] FP8 support for MoE kernel / Mixtral (#4244) This PR is the first step towards fixing https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/3208 It implements dynamic per-tensor scaling (see https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/4118), so users do not need to compute activation scales on a calibration dataset and they also don't need to convert their model checkpoints. It is enough to specify the `quantization="fp8"` argument. You can try out the PR like this: ```python from vllm import LLM, SamplingParams prompts = [ "Hello, my name is", "The president of the United States is", "The capital of France is", "The future of AI is", ] sampling_params = SamplingParams(temperature=0.8, top_p=0.95) llm = LLM(model="mistralai/Mixtral-8x7B-Instruct-v0.1", tensor_parallel_size=2, quantization="fp8") outputs = llm.generate(prompts, sampling_params) # Print the outputs. for output in outputs: prompt = output.prompt generated_text = output.outputs[0].text print(f"Prompt: {prompt!r}, Generated text: {generated_text!r}") ``` **Performance**: For this PR, the focus is on making the code clean (while still trying to get reasonable performance), there is a bunch of optimizations that we will submit as a follow up PR that significantly improve the performance (similar to the numbers in https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/3954). With this PR, the results are as follows: <img width="725" alt="Screenshot 2024-04-21 at 1 31 50 PM" src="https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/assets/113316/d8fe1118-07a0-4d4e-8530-37a77d465a03"> **Accuracy**: The accuracy with this PR on MMLU on `mistralai/Mixtral-8x7B-v0.1` is as follows: ``` | Groups |Version|Filter|n-shot|Metric|Value | |Stderr| |------------------|-------|------|-----:|------|-----:|---|-----:| |mmlu |N/A |none | 0|acc |0.7018|± |0.0036| | - humanities |N/A |none | 5|acc |0.6472|± |0.0065| | - other |N/A |none | 5|acc |0.7673|± |0.0072| | - social_sciences|N/A |none | 5|acc |0.8099|± |0.0070| | - stem |N/A |none | 5|acc |0.6131|± |0.0083| ``` this compares favorably with the fp16 results which are ``` | Groups |Version|Filter|n-shot|Metric|Value | |Stderr| |------------------|-------|------|-----:|------|-----:|---|-----:| |mmlu |N/A |none | 0|acc |0.7020|± |0.1313| | - humanities |N/A |none | 5|acc |0.6425|± |0.1349| | - other |N/A |none | 5|acc |0.7744|± |0.1038| | - social_sciences|N/A |none | 5|acc |0.8131|± |0.0695| | - stem |N/A |none | 5|acc |0.6108|± |0.1383| ``` Happy hacking!
2024-04-23 18:18:23 -07:00
}
__syncthreads();
ib /= 2;
}
// Finally, since cache[0] contains the maximum for this thread block,
// atomically write the max to the target location
if (threadIdx.x == 0) {
atomicMaxFloat(scale,
cache[0] / std::numeric_limits<c10::Float8_e4m3fn>::max());
[Kernel] FP8 support for MoE kernel / Mixtral (#4244) This PR is the first step towards fixing https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/3208 It implements dynamic per-tensor scaling (see https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/4118), so users do not need to compute activation scales on a calibration dataset and they also don't need to convert their model checkpoints. It is enough to specify the `quantization="fp8"` argument. You can try out the PR like this: ```python from vllm import LLM, SamplingParams prompts = [ "Hello, my name is", "The president of the United States is", "The capital of France is", "The future of AI is", ] sampling_params = SamplingParams(temperature=0.8, top_p=0.95) llm = LLM(model="mistralai/Mixtral-8x7B-Instruct-v0.1", tensor_parallel_size=2, quantization="fp8") outputs = llm.generate(prompts, sampling_params) # Print the outputs. for output in outputs: prompt = output.prompt generated_text = output.outputs[0].text print(f"Prompt: {prompt!r}, Generated text: {generated_text!r}") ``` **Performance**: For this PR, the focus is on making the code clean (while still trying to get reasonable performance), there is a bunch of optimizations that we will submit as a follow up PR that significantly improve the performance (similar to the numbers in https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/3954). With this PR, the results are as follows: <img width="725" alt="Screenshot 2024-04-21 at 1 31 50 PM" src="https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/assets/113316/d8fe1118-07a0-4d4e-8530-37a77d465a03"> **Accuracy**: The accuracy with this PR on MMLU on `mistralai/Mixtral-8x7B-v0.1` is as follows: ``` | Groups |Version|Filter|n-shot|Metric|Value | |Stderr| |------------------|-------|------|-----:|------|-----:|---|-----:| |mmlu |N/A |none | 0|acc |0.7018|± |0.0036| | - humanities |N/A |none | 5|acc |0.6472|± |0.0065| | - other |N/A |none | 5|acc |0.7673|± |0.0072| | - social_sciences|N/A |none | 5|acc |0.8099|± |0.0070| | - stem |N/A |none | 5|acc |0.6131|± |0.0083| ``` this compares favorably with the fp16 results which are ``` | Groups |Version|Filter|n-shot|Metric|Value | |Stderr| |------------------|-------|------|-----:|------|-----:|---|-----:| |mmlu |N/A |none | 0|acc |0.7020|± |0.1313| | - humanities |N/A |none | 5|acc |0.6425|± |0.1349| | - other |N/A |none | 5|acc |0.7744|± |0.1038| | - social_sciences|N/A |none | 5|acc |0.8131|± |0.0695| | - stem |N/A |none | 5|acc |0.6108|± |0.1383| ``` Happy hacking!
2024-04-23 18:18:23 -07:00
}
}
template <typename scalar_t>
__global__ void scaled_fp8_quant_kernel(c10::Float8_e4m3fn* __restrict__ out,
const scalar_t* __restrict__ input,
const float* __restrict__ scale,
int64_t num_elems) {
[Kernel] FP8 support for MoE kernel / Mixtral (#4244) This PR is the first step towards fixing https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/3208 It implements dynamic per-tensor scaling (see https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/4118), so users do not need to compute activation scales on a calibration dataset and they also don't need to convert their model checkpoints. It is enough to specify the `quantization="fp8"` argument. You can try out the PR like this: ```python from vllm import LLM, SamplingParams prompts = [ "Hello, my name is", "The president of the United States is", "The capital of France is", "The future of AI is", ] sampling_params = SamplingParams(temperature=0.8, top_p=0.95) llm = LLM(model="mistralai/Mixtral-8x7B-Instruct-v0.1", tensor_parallel_size=2, quantization="fp8") outputs = llm.generate(prompts, sampling_params) # Print the outputs. for output in outputs: prompt = output.prompt generated_text = output.outputs[0].text print(f"Prompt: {prompt!r}, Generated text: {generated_text!r}") ``` **Performance**: For this PR, the focus is on making the code clean (while still trying to get reasonable performance), there is a bunch of optimizations that we will submit as a follow up PR that significantly improve the performance (similar to the numbers in https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/3954). With this PR, the results are as follows: <img width="725" alt="Screenshot 2024-04-21 at 1 31 50 PM" src="https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/assets/113316/d8fe1118-07a0-4d4e-8530-37a77d465a03"> **Accuracy**: The accuracy with this PR on MMLU on `mistralai/Mixtral-8x7B-v0.1` is as follows: ``` | Groups |Version|Filter|n-shot|Metric|Value | |Stderr| |------------------|-------|------|-----:|------|-----:|---|-----:| |mmlu |N/A |none | 0|acc |0.7018|± |0.0036| | - humanities |N/A |none | 5|acc |0.6472|± |0.0065| | - other |N/A |none | 5|acc |0.7673|± |0.0072| | - social_sciences|N/A |none | 5|acc |0.8099|± |0.0070| | - stem |N/A |none | 5|acc |0.6131|± |0.0083| ``` this compares favorably with the fp16 results which are ``` | Groups |Version|Filter|n-shot|Metric|Value | |Stderr| |------------------|-------|------|-----:|------|-----:|---|-----:| |mmlu |N/A |none | 0|acc |0.7020|± |0.1313| | - humanities |N/A |none | 5|acc |0.6425|± |0.1349| | - other |N/A |none | 5|acc |0.7744|± |0.1038| | - social_sciences|N/A |none | 5|acc |0.8131|± |0.0695| | - stem |N/A |none | 5|acc |0.6108|± |0.1383| ``` Happy hacking!
2024-04-23 18:18:23 -07:00
int i = blockDim.x * blockIdx.x + threadIdx.x;
while (i < num_elems) {
[Kernel] Make static FP8 scaling more robust (#4570) Previously FP8 static scaling works if the scales are overestimating the maxima of all activation tensors during computation. However this will not always be the case even if the scales were calibrated very carefully. For example, with the activations in my checkpoint https://huggingface.co/pcmoritz/Mixtral-8x7B-v0.1-fp8-act-scale (which was calibrated on https://huggingface.co/datasets/HuggingFaceH4/ultrachat_200k), I'm getting the following mostly random performance on MMLU: | Groups |Version|Filter|n-shot|Metric|Value | |Stderr| |------------------|-------|------|-----:|------|-----:|---|-----:| |mmlu |N/A |none | 0|acc |0.2295|± |0.0035| | - humanities |N/A |none | 5|acc |0.2421|± |0.0062| | - other |N/A |none | 5|acc |0.2398|± |0.0076| | - social_sciences|N/A |none | 5|acc |0.2171|± |0.0074| | - stem |N/A |none | 5|acc |0.2125|± |0.0073| With the fix in this PR where the scaled activations are clamped between [-std::numeric_limits<c10::Float8_e4m3fn>::max(), std::numeric_limits<c10::Float8_e4m3fn>::max()] to make sure there are no NaNs, the performance is | Groups |Version|Filter|n-shot|Metric|Value | |Stderr| |------------------|-------|------|-----:|------|-----:|---|-----:| |mmlu |N/A |none | 0|acc |0.7008|± |0.0036| | - humanities |N/A |none | 5|acc |0.6453|± |0.0065| | - other |N/A |none | 5|acc |0.7692|± |0.0072| | - social_sciences|N/A |none | 5|acc |0.8083|± |0.0070| | - stem |N/A |none | 5|acc |0.6115|± |0.0083| This is not perfect yet but is getting very close to the FP16 / dynamic activation scale performance.
2024-05-06 17:39:28 -07:00
out[i] = scaled_fp8_conversion(input[i], *scale);
[Kernel] FP8 support for MoE kernel / Mixtral (#4244) This PR is the first step towards fixing https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/3208 It implements dynamic per-tensor scaling (see https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/4118), so users do not need to compute activation scales on a calibration dataset and they also don't need to convert their model checkpoints. It is enough to specify the `quantization="fp8"` argument. You can try out the PR like this: ```python from vllm import LLM, SamplingParams prompts = [ "Hello, my name is", "The president of the United States is", "The capital of France is", "The future of AI is", ] sampling_params = SamplingParams(temperature=0.8, top_p=0.95) llm = LLM(model="mistralai/Mixtral-8x7B-Instruct-v0.1", tensor_parallel_size=2, quantization="fp8") outputs = llm.generate(prompts, sampling_params) # Print the outputs. for output in outputs: prompt = output.prompt generated_text = output.outputs[0].text print(f"Prompt: {prompt!r}, Generated text: {generated_text!r}") ``` **Performance**: For this PR, the focus is on making the code clean (while still trying to get reasonable performance), there is a bunch of optimizations that we will submit as a follow up PR that significantly improve the performance (similar to the numbers in https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/3954). With this PR, the results are as follows: <img width="725" alt="Screenshot 2024-04-21 at 1 31 50 PM" src="https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/assets/113316/d8fe1118-07a0-4d4e-8530-37a77d465a03"> **Accuracy**: The accuracy with this PR on MMLU on `mistralai/Mixtral-8x7B-v0.1` is as follows: ``` | Groups |Version|Filter|n-shot|Metric|Value | |Stderr| |------------------|-------|------|-----:|------|-----:|---|-----:| |mmlu |N/A |none | 0|acc |0.7018|± |0.0036| | - humanities |N/A |none | 5|acc |0.6472|± |0.0065| | - other |N/A |none | 5|acc |0.7673|± |0.0072| | - social_sciences|N/A |none | 5|acc |0.8099|± |0.0070| | - stem |N/A |none | 5|acc |0.6131|± |0.0083| ``` this compares favorably with the fp16 results which are ``` | Groups |Version|Filter|n-shot|Metric|Value | |Stderr| |------------------|-------|------|-----:|------|-----:|---|-----:| |mmlu |N/A |none | 0|acc |0.7020|± |0.1313| | - humanities |N/A |none | 5|acc |0.6425|± |0.1349| | - other |N/A |none | 5|acc |0.7744|± |0.1038| | - social_sciences|N/A |none | 5|acc |0.8131|± |0.0695| | - stem |N/A |none | 5|acc |0.6108|± |0.1383| ``` Happy hacking!
2024-04-23 18:18:23 -07:00
i += blockDim.x * gridDim.x;
}
}
} // namespace vllm
[Kernel] FP8 support for MoE kernel / Mixtral (#4244) This PR is the first step towards fixing https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/3208 It implements dynamic per-tensor scaling (see https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/4118), so users do not need to compute activation scales on a calibration dataset and they also don't need to convert their model checkpoints. It is enough to specify the `quantization="fp8"` argument. You can try out the PR like this: ```python from vllm import LLM, SamplingParams prompts = [ "Hello, my name is", "The president of the United States is", "The capital of France is", "The future of AI is", ] sampling_params = SamplingParams(temperature=0.8, top_p=0.95) llm = LLM(model="mistralai/Mixtral-8x7B-Instruct-v0.1", tensor_parallel_size=2, quantization="fp8") outputs = llm.generate(prompts, sampling_params) # Print the outputs. for output in outputs: prompt = output.prompt generated_text = output.outputs[0].text print(f"Prompt: {prompt!r}, Generated text: {generated_text!r}") ``` **Performance**: For this PR, the focus is on making the code clean (while still trying to get reasonable performance), there is a bunch of optimizations that we will submit as a follow up PR that significantly improve the performance (similar to the numbers in https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/3954). With this PR, the results are as follows: <img width="725" alt="Screenshot 2024-04-21 at 1 31 50 PM" src="https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/assets/113316/d8fe1118-07a0-4d4e-8530-37a77d465a03"> **Accuracy**: The accuracy with this PR on MMLU on `mistralai/Mixtral-8x7B-v0.1` is as follows: ``` | Groups |Version|Filter|n-shot|Metric|Value | |Stderr| |------------------|-------|------|-----:|------|-----:|---|-----:| |mmlu |N/A |none | 0|acc |0.7018|± |0.0036| | - humanities |N/A |none | 5|acc |0.6472|± |0.0065| | - other |N/A |none | 5|acc |0.7673|± |0.0072| | - social_sciences|N/A |none | 5|acc |0.8099|± |0.0070| | - stem |N/A |none | 5|acc |0.6131|± |0.0083| ``` this compares favorably with the fp16 results which are ``` | Groups |Version|Filter|n-shot|Metric|Value | |Stderr| |------------------|-------|------|-----:|------|-----:|---|-----:| |mmlu |N/A |none | 0|acc |0.7020|± |0.1313| | - humanities |N/A |none | 5|acc |0.6425|± |0.1349| | - other |N/A |none | 5|acc |0.7744|± |0.1038| | - social_sciences|N/A |none | 5|acc |0.8131|± |0.0695| | - stem |N/A |none | 5|acc |0.6108|± |0.1383| ``` Happy hacking!
2024-04-23 18:18:23 -07:00
void static_scaled_fp8_quant(torch::Tensor& out, // [..., d]
torch::Tensor& input, // [..., d]
torch::Tensor& scale) // [1]
{
int64_t num_tokens = input.numel() / input.size(-1);
int64_t num_elems = input.numel();
dim3 grid(num_tokens);
dim3 block(1024);
const at::cuda::OptionalCUDAGuard device_guard(device_of(input));
const cudaStream_t stream = at::cuda::getCurrentCUDAStream();
VLLM_DISPATCH_FLOATING_TYPES(
input.scalar_type(), "scaled_fp8_quant_kernel", [&] {
vllm::scaled_fp8_quant_kernel<scalar_t><<<grid, block, 0, stream>>>(
out.data_ptr<c10::Float8_e4m3fn>(), input.data_ptr<scalar_t>(),
scale.data_ptr<float>(), num_elems);
});
}
void dynamic_scaled_fp8_quant(torch::Tensor& out, // [..., d]
torch::Tensor& input, // [..., d]
torch::Tensor& scale) // [1]
[Kernel] FP8 support for MoE kernel / Mixtral (#4244) This PR is the first step towards fixing https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/3208 It implements dynamic per-tensor scaling (see https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/4118), so users do not need to compute activation scales on a calibration dataset and they also don't need to convert their model checkpoints. It is enough to specify the `quantization="fp8"` argument. You can try out the PR like this: ```python from vllm import LLM, SamplingParams prompts = [ "Hello, my name is", "The president of the United States is", "The capital of France is", "The future of AI is", ] sampling_params = SamplingParams(temperature=0.8, top_p=0.95) llm = LLM(model="mistralai/Mixtral-8x7B-Instruct-v0.1", tensor_parallel_size=2, quantization="fp8") outputs = llm.generate(prompts, sampling_params) # Print the outputs. for output in outputs: prompt = output.prompt generated_text = output.outputs[0].text print(f"Prompt: {prompt!r}, Generated text: {generated_text!r}") ``` **Performance**: For this PR, the focus is on making the code clean (while still trying to get reasonable performance), there is a bunch of optimizations that we will submit as a follow up PR that significantly improve the performance (similar to the numbers in https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/3954). With this PR, the results are as follows: <img width="725" alt="Screenshot 2024-04-21 at 1 31 50 PM" src="https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/assets/113316/d8fe1118-07a0-4d4e-8530-37a77d465a03"> **Accuracy**: The accuracy with this PR on MMLU on `mistralai/Mixtral-8x7B-v0.1` is as follows: ``` | Groups |Version|Filter|n-shot|Metric|Value | |Stderr| |------------------|-------|------|-----:|------|-----:|---|-----:| |mmlu |N/A |none | 0|acc |0.7018|± |0.0036| | - humanities |N/A |none | 5|acc |0.6472|± |0.0065| | - other |N/A |none | 5|acc |0.7673|± |0.0072| | - social_sciences|N/A |none | 5|acc |0.8099|± |0.0070| | - stem |N/A |none | 5|acc |0.6131|± |0.0083| ``` this compares favorably with the fp16 results which are ``` | Groups |Version|Filter|n-shot|Metric|Value | |Stderr| |------------------|-------|------|-----:|------|-----:|---|-----:| |mmlu |N/A |none | 0|acc |0.7020|± |0.1313| | - humanities |N/A |none | 5|acc |0.6425|± |0.1349| | - other |N/A |none | 5|acc |0.7744|± |0.1038| | - social_sciences|N/A |none | 5|acc |0.8131|± |0.0695| | - stem |N/A |none | 5|acc |0.6108|± |0.1383| ``` Happy hacking!
2024-04-23 18:18:23 -07:00
{
int64_t num_tokens = input.numel() / input.size(-1);
int64_t num_elems = input.numel();
dim3 grid(num_tokens);
dim3 block(1024);
const at::cuda::OptionalCUDAGuard device_guard(device_of(input));
const cudaStream_t stream = at::cuda::getCurrentCUDAStream();
VLLM_DISPATCH_FLOATING_TYPES(
input.scalar_type(), "scaled_fp8_quant_kernel", [&] {
vllm::segmented_max_reduction<scalar_t><<<grid, block, 0, stream>>>(
scale.data_ptr<float>(), input.data_ptr<scalar_t>(), num_elems);
vllm::scaled_fp8_quant_kernel<scalar_t><<<grid, block, 0, stream>>>(
out.data_ptr<c10::Float8_e4m3fn>(), input.data_ptr<scalar_t>(),
scale.data_ptr<float>(), num_elems);
[Kernel] FP8 support for MoE kernel / Mixtral (#4244) This PR is the first step towards fixing https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/3208 It implements dynamic per-tensor scaling (see https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/4118), so users do not need to compute activation scales on a calibration dataset and they also don't need to convert their model checkpoints. It is enough to specify the `quantization="fp8"` argument. You can try out the PR like this: ```python from vllm import LLM, SamplingParams prompts = [ "Hello, my name is", "The president of the United States is", "The capital of France is", "The future of AI is", ] sampling_params = SamplingParams(temperature=0.8, top_p=0.95) llm = LLM(model="mistralai/Mixtral-8x7B-Instruct-v0.1", tensor_parallel_size=2, quantization="fp8") outputs = llm.generate(prompts, sampling_params) # Print the outputs. for output in outputs: prompt = output.prompt generated_text = output.outputs[0].text print(f"Prompt: {prompt!r}, Generated text: {generated_text!r}") ``` **Performance**: For this PR, the focus is on making the code clean (while still trying to get reasonable performance), there is a bunch of optimizations that we will submit as a follow up PR that significantly improve the performance (similar to the numbers in https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/3954). With this PR, the results are as follows: <img width="725" alt="Screenshot 2024-04-21 at 1 31 50 PM" src="https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/assets/113316/d8fe1118-07a0-4d4e-8530-37a77d465a03"> **Accuracy**: The accuracy with this PR on MMLU on `mistralai/Mixtral-8x7B-v0.1` is as follows: ``` | Groups |Version|Filter|n-shot|Metric|Value | |Stderr| |------------------|-------|------|-----:|------|-----:|---|-----:| |mmlu |N/A |none | 0|acc |0.7018|± |0.0036| | - humanities |N/A |none | 5|acc |0.6472|± |0.0065| | - other |N/A |none | 5|acc |0.7673|± |0.0072| | - social_sciences|N/A |none | 5|acc |0.8099|± |0.0070| | - stem |N/A |none | 5|acc |0.6131|± |0.0083| ``` this compares favorably with the fp16 results which are ``` | Groups |Version|Filter|n-shot|Metric|Value | |Stderr| |------------------|-------|------|-----:|------|-----:|---|-----:| |mmlu |N/A |none | 0|acc |0.7020|± |0.1313| | - humanities |N/A |none | 5|acc |0.6425|± |0.1349| | - other |N/A |none | 5|acc |0.7744|± |0.1038| | - social_sciences|N/A |none | 5|acc |0.8131|± |0.0695| | - stem |N/A |none | 5|acc |0.6108|± |0.1383| ``` Happy hacking!
2024-04-23 18:18:23 -07:00
});
}